Characteristics and predictors of infusion-related reactions to rituximab in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

This retrospective study aimed to assess the characteristics and predictors of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) to rituximab in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). The medical records of adult patients with B-NHL who received their first cycle of rituximab from August 2020 to August 2022 were reviewed. IRRs were defined as any signs experienced by patients during rituximab infusion and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. During the study period, 334 patients were included; among them, 100 patients (30%) developed IRRs (mean age 54.7 (SD 13.2) years). Of the reported IRRs, 90% were grade II reactions, and 10% were grade III reactions. The multivariate analysis identified indolent lymphoma [OR 1.90, p = 0.025], no hydrocortisone as premedication [OR 3.03, p = 0.029], thrombocytopenia [OR 2.55, p = 0.009], and absolute lymphocyte count ≥ 2000 lymphocytes/microL [OR 1.74, p = 0.045] as independent predictors for IRRs.

Outcome and patterns of relapse in primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with RCHOP.

OBJECTIVES: Patterns and predictors of relapse in primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were variably reported. Our study aims to evaluate the patterns and predictors of relapse in early-stage gastric DLBCL treated with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisolone (RCHOP). METHODS: From 2005 to 2019, the medical records of 72 patients with stage I or stage II gastric DLBCL treated with six cycles of RCHOP without radiotherapy were reviewed. Different variables were correlated with progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and local relapse free survival (LRFS). RESULTS: 64 (88.1%) patients achieved a complete response (CR), while 8 (11.9%) had refractory disease. After CR, 9 (14%) patients relapsed; 7 (78%) relapses were loco-regional. Abnormal LDH (p = 0.028), H. pylori negative (p = 0.032) and, stage adjusted international prognostic index (sa-IPI) > 1 (p = 0.013) correlated with loco-regional failure. The 5-year PFS, OS, and LRFS were 74.8%, 75.3%, and 87.5%, respectively, after a median follow-up of 58 (range: 6-185) months. The median time to progression or relapse was 9 months (range: 5-54 months). In multivariate analysis, a sa-IPI >1 (HR: 3.56, CI: 1.35-8.8, p = 0.01) was associated with PFS while low albumin (HR: 8.85, CI: 1.09-71.4, p = 0.041) was associated with worse OS. None of the variables were associated with LRFS. CONCLUSION: Treatment of primary gastric DLBCL with RCHOP results in a high CR rate. The majority of treatment failures were loco-regional. Sa-IPI and H. pylori status may be used to identify patients who may benefit from combined modality treatment.

Validation of the CSRFENCE score for prediction of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy cycles 2-6.

PURPOSE: Though febrile neutropenia (FN) risk prediction models are important in clinical practice, their external validation is limited. In this study, we validated the Cycle-Specific Risk of FEbrile Neutropenia after ChEmotherapy (CSRFENCE) score for predicting FN. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with solid malignancies and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma during chemotherapy cycles 2-6 and recorded if patients developed FN, defined as absolute neutrophil counts less than 500 cells/microL with fever more than or equal to 38.2 â„ƒ. The CSRFENCE score was determined by adding the risk factors' coefficients described by the original study; subsequently, the score was used to classify chemotherapy cycles into the following risk groups for developing FN: low, intermediate, high, and very high risk. The discriminatory ability of the score was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROCC) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) within each CSRFENCE risk group. RESULTS: We analyzed 2870 chemotherapy cycles, of which 42 (1.5%) were associated with FN. Among those, 3 (7.1%), 14 (33.3%), 5 (12%), and 20 (47.6%) were classified as low, intermediate, high, and very high risk for developing FN, respectively. The AUROCC was 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.81). Compared with the low risk group (n = 666), the IRR of developing FN was 1.01 (95% CI 0.15-43.37), 0.69 (95% CI 0.08-32.46) and 1.17 (95% CI 0.17-49.49) in the intermediate (n = 1431), high (n = 498) and very high (n = 275) risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CSRFENCE model can moderately stratify patients into four risk groups for predicting FN prior to chemotherapy cycles 2-6.

Validation of the FENCE Risk Groups for Prediction of Febrile Neutropenia With First-Cycle Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The FEbrile Neutropenia after ChEmotherapy (FENCE) score was developed to estimate the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) at first cycle of chemotherapy but has not been externally validated. We aimed to validate the FENCE score based on its risk groups in patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of treatment-naïve adult patients with solid tumors and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who received first-cycle chemotherapy between January and November 2019. Patients were followed until the second cycle of chemotherapy to identify any FN events (neutrophil count <0.5 × 109/L with fever ≥38.2°C). The FENCE score was determined and patients classified as low, intermediate, high, and very high risk. The discriminatory ability of classifying patients into FENCE risk groups was calculated as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and incidence rate ratios within each FENCE risk group. RESULTS: FN was documented during the first cycle of chemotherapy in 45 of the 918 patients included (5%). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58 to 0.73). Compared with the low-risk group (n = 285), the incidence rate ratio of developing FN was 1.58 (95% CI = 0.54 to 5.21), 3.16 (95% CI = 1.09 to 10.25), and 3.93 (95% CI = 1.46 to 12.27) in the intermediate (n = 293), high (n = 162), and very high (n = 178) risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, classifying patients into FENCE risk groups demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability for predicting FN. Further validation in multicenter studies is necessary to determine its generalizability.

Impact of clinical pharmacists in an inpatient medical oncology service: A prospective study at a comprehensive cancer center in Jordan.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical pharmacy is considered an integral discipline in the health care system for optimizing therapy and reducing drug-related problems. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacists in optimizing management in a medical oncology service. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at King Hussein Cancer Center between July 2019 and September 2019 of patients admitted to the medical oncology service. The impact of clinical pharmacists was measured by evaluating their interventions, defined as actions that were expected to result in a change in patient management. Data were collected daily by routine review of patients' profiles and by recording clinical pharmacists' interventions. The data collected were baseline characteristics of patients, numbers and types of clinical pharmacists' interventions, their significance, medications involved, and rate of acceptance of clinical pharmacists' interventions by physicians. The significance of each intervention was assessed by two clinical pharmacists on a Hatoum scale. Physicians' acceptance was assessed by whether the recommendations were implemented. RESULTS: During the study period, 748 patients were included, of whom 605 required a total of 1683 clinical interventions. The mean age was 56.3 years (±15.5 SD). Of the interventions, 39% resulted in initiation of a drug and 25% in drug discontinuations. The drug group most commonly associated with clinical pharmacists' interventions was antibiotics (26.5%). Physicians accepted 98% of the clinical pharmacists' interventions, and 92.4% of the interventions brought care to a more appropriate level and were considered significant. CONCLUSION: Most patients in the medical oncology service required clinical pharmacists' interventions, as demonstrated by the high number of significant clinical pharmacists' interventions. Studies should be conducted to follow up these findings with respect to patient outcomes and cost savings.

Comparing the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia Resulting in Hospital Admission Between the Branded Docetaxel and the Generic Formulations.

Studies have raised concern about the safety of generic compared with branded drugs. Febrile neutropenia (FN) resulting in hospital admission was compared between the branded docetaxel (Taxotere®, Sanofi) and 2 generic formulations (docetaxel Ebewe and docetaxel Hospira) in patients with breast cancer. This was a retrospective study that included patients with breast cancer who received docetaxel between January 2012 and December 2014. Patients who had an admission diagnosis of FN and had received docetaxel within 14 days prior to admission were evaluated. The docetaxel brand and dose, patient characteristics, hospital length of stay, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality were recorded. During the study period, 2904 cycles of docetaxel were given for 876 patients (1519 cycles of docetaxel Sanofi, 811 cycles of docetaxel Hospira, and 574 cycles of docetaxel Ebewe). Among the cycles given, 130 cycles were associated with FN that required hospital admission. The overall incidence of FN resulting in hospital admission was significantly higher in patients who had received docetaxel Hospira, compared with patients who had received docetaxel Sanofi (47[5.8%] cycles vs 53 [3.5%] cycles, P = .009), but there was no significant difference between docetaxel Ebewe and docetaxel Sanofi (30[5.2%] cycles vs 53 [3.5%] cycles, P = .069). All cases of FN resolved except for 1 patient who died in the ICU after receiving docetaxel Ebewe. There was a significant difference in the incidence of FN between docetaxel Sanofi and docetaxel Hospira, but all cases in both groups resolved completely.